|
What is the ELLI Research
Project?
The aim of this research project was to identify the
characteristics and qualities of effective lifelong
learners and to develop tools and strategies for tracking,
evaluating and recording people's growth as effective
real-life learners. It was funded by the Lifelong Learning
Foundation.
There were two major research strands, a scientific
strand concerned with identifying the components of
'learning power' and a dynamic strand concerned with
exploring how those (provisional) dimensions of 'learning
power' might be useful in teaching and learning in the
classroom.
Scientific Strand: What is Learning Power?
| |
|
Learning Power:
A complex mix of dispositions, lived experiences,
social relations, values, attitudes and beliefs
that coalesce to shape the nature of an individual's
engagement with any particular learning opportunity.
|
|
|
The data have proved remarkably robust over successive
factor analytic studies. We have identified seven dimensions
of 'learning power' and reliable scales to assess these.
These dimensions also differentiate between effective
learners and ineffective learners. The dimensions are
described as changing & learning, meaning making,
curiosity, creativity, learning relationships, strategic
awareness and resilience
These dimensions are all inter-related aspects of learning
power, and people whose profile is low on these dimensions
appear to be fragile and dependent as learners. Thus
the ELLI profile is a means of identifying the strengths
and weaknesses of individual learners. Strategic awareness
appears to be a 'second order' or learned dimension
- in other words it is something that can be developed
and taught over time, and in some ways functions as
the individual's 'monitoring system' for the other dimensions.
These ELLI learning dimensions are rather like a shadow
of the formal curriculum, and are applicable to all
subjects and disciplines in the classroom and beyond.
The research project gathered data on nearly 2000 learners
from the age of 7 through to adult learners. What was
clear from this data was that over time, and through
the course of formal schooling students actually become
weaker on ALL learning dimensions, but especially creativity.
At the same time they actually become MORE dependent
and fragile as learners.
Dynamic Strand: Building Learning Power in the Classroom
The school based research entailed teachers working
with these learning dimensions in practical ways in
order to understand how they may be useful to promote
learner self awareness and growth in the classroom.
The teachers found the learning dimensions easy to use
and exciting because they reach to the heart of teacher
professional purpose. Sixteen teachers, across four
schools, received learning profiles for individuals
in their classes and the average profiles for the whole
class. They then used this information to decide on
new 'learning interventions' that were specifically
aimed at nurturing students' learning power. These interventions
ranged from re-organising the way in which information
was presented to students to a specific focus on self-assessment
using the language learning.
These interventions made a difference to students'
learning power profiles after two terms - in particular
they became more resilient and more strategically aware
of their own learning and less dependent and fragile.
There were also indications that students actually achieved
more in terms of standard learning outcomes. The control
cohort, who matched the experimental group, actually
became weaker on the learning dimensions, in keeping
with the evidence from the whole cohort.
The key themes underpinning the learning interventions
were - teacher professional vision and values, the creation
of positive interpersonal relationships which involved
trust, affirmation and challenge, quality of dialogue,
use of learning language, modelling and imitation and
teacher professional judgement. There is no single formula
for success, but these dimensions appear to be an important
part of the ecology of learning. The critical factor
is the professional vision of the teacher and the school
climate.
At a time when there is overwhelming evidence of the
devastatingly negative effects of much summative assessment
on the quality and quantity of learner motivation (Harlen
and Deakin-Crick 2002), where students are more and more
oriented towards 'trading for grades' and teachers to
'teaching the test', these findings are of strategic
importance for education policy and practice.
Ruth Deakin Crick, Patricia Broadfoot & Guy Claxton
For enquires about the research findings please contact Dr Ruth
Deakin-Crick at the University of Bristol - Email ruth.deakin-crick@bristol.ac.uk
Back to About ELLI
|